|
|
Post by Graeme on Jul 30, 2017 0:33:35 GMT
HaT already has French ammunition caisson, wurst wagon, baggage wagon, two ambulences, a field forge and pontoon train and also an Austrian ammunition wagon in their range. If you haven't seen these already have a look at these links on PSR: www.plasticsoldierreview.com/PeriodList.aspx?period=22#France-OtherI wouldn't mind seeing some support vehicles for the British and Prussians though. |
|
007
Quaestor
Posts: 6 
|
Post by 007 on Jul 30, 2017 9:10:46 GMT
Hi Graeme, Thank you for replying to my post regarding the lack of support vehicle kits. The link to the Plastic Soldier Review site shows that Hat produce several kits all of which will be of interest to me. It has also provided a useful source of information on what is available from other manufacturers.  |
|
|
|
Post by mateus on Aug 1, 2017 18:34:32 GMT
Doe this mean your saying that the Austrians are for the crowdfunding or possibly for general production sometime soon . It means we are working on the Austrian restocks. Oh, boy, this makes me a happy nappy! |
|
|
|
Post by wrmountfield on Sept 14, 2017 14:50:25 GMT
persanly i think you shuld put the new brunswick infantry up for croud funding
|
|
|
|
Post by gbvarese on Sept 15, 2017 7:15:59 GMT
Dear Hat and dear all,
With regard to the next crowdfunding, I keep on searching for allies to sustain the implementation of the long time waited Nap Austrian Infantry set, integrated with my indications of 3, 26 and 27 July. Giovanni.
|
|
|
|
Post by steve on Sept 21, 2017 17:11:46 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Brian on Sept 23, 2017 16:03:58 GMT
The Brunswickers seem to be gathering more support which is nice to see although I could be wrong but, I think Hat wanted to produce figures from the Masters that they already have first, to my knowledge Hat have never showed us any progress on the Brunswick Infantry so perhaps this one for the future.
Either way I am still backing 1/72 scale Napoleonic Austrian Infantry (in Helmets with spare Shako's or vice versa), Masters are done, Box Art done already a cost saving there and they seem to have good support on the forum, at last there would be a decent set of Napoleonic Austrian Infantry perfect to fill the Battlefields of Wargammers and Diorama makers alike.
|
|
|
|
Post by gbvarese on Sept 24, 2017 13:57:09 GMT
Dear Brian,
I perfectly agree with you, also according to
my previous messages. Giovanni.
|
|
|
|
Post by Traveller_ on Oct 3, 2017 11:26:12 GMT
How many crowdfunding projects can be active at the same time? If people want Brunswicks then fine, but many of us want to see the ACW sets too.
|
|
|
|
Post by elektrikeal on Oct 5, 2017 20:49:00 GMT
ACW !!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by steve on Oct 5, 2017 21:44:07 GMT
Brunswick , ACW, & Austrians should have a vote off to see whats most wanted
|
|
|
|
Post by traveller1865 on Oct 6, 2017 8:36:22 GMT
Brunswick , ACW, & Austrians should have a vote off to see whats most wanted
I guess that's what it comes down to in the end, sad that not all can be made, just wish there was more we customers could do, I'd donate in an instant if it meant we could have all new ACW 1/72 sets.
|
|
|
|
Post by Edwardian on Oct 7, 2017 9:34:03 GMT
If there was to be MAC sets, or, rather, something like the forthcoming Prussian Landwehr with attack and marching sets, including command figures, for the Brunswickers. Alternative heads would allow for both Lieb and Line/Light
I would also love to see a decent French staff set. We have seen Napoleons and Marshalls and colourful ADCs, but it would be useful to have a quality set of mounted Generals of Division and Brigade and a sensible number of mounted ADCs in regulation uniform - 2 GdeDs, 4 GdeBs and 6 ADCs?
|
|
|
|
Post by gbvarese on Oct 7, 2017 10:39:25 GMT
Dear Edwardian,
A part for the Nap Austrians, on which I've been strongly insisting for months, I fully sustain your request. It's true: there are in commerce a lot of marshals and superior mounted officers (colonels) but few mounted generals (Italeri), which are desperately needed for wargames and dioramas.
Giovanni.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kkniveton on Oct 8, 2017 14:57:31 GMT
I would love to see some dark ages sets : normans, saxons, vikings or 100 years war set as there are very few from other prevalent manufacturers.
|
|
|
|
Post by Minamoto on Nov 6, 2017 22:44:44 GMT
12th-13th Century Medieval Far East Asia - Song dynasty China, Goryeo Korea and Kamakura Japan etc. All we have currently from these huge epic conflicts are a few Mongol sets and Italeri's Chinese cavalry.
|
|
|
|
Post by traveller1865 on Nov 7, 2017 14:25:50 GMT
One more plea for the American topics! AWI and ACW need a 1/72 reboot, they're popular among collectors and the current output such as Italeri and Imex is not so good.
|
|
|
|
Post by Edwardian on Nov 23, 2017 17:32:52 GMT
Brunswickers already exist in non-MAC format. The only point of more Brunswickers would be as a MAC release, and there were enough of them at Waterloo to make that worthwhile.
I'd do it before HaT does, if I were HaT
|
|
|
|
Post by Ironsides on Nov 23, 2017 22:19:21 GMT
Hi All, you should be aware that the guest posters asking for Brunwickers, was all the same person using different guest names, this user has been banned and all posts deleted.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brian on Nov 23, 2017 23:18:05 GMT
Hi All, you should be aware that the guest posters asking for Brunwickers, was all the same person using different guest names, this user has been banned and all posts deleted. If the Brunswicker fan want's to come on and put his case for the Brunswickers than that's fine with me, I would be interested myself for new Brunswickers although they are somewhat down my list of Napoleonic priorities at the moment, using multiple names actually weakens his argument (I am sure it's not the first or last time it's happened), it would have been interesting to see the Brunswickers make the funding stage just to see how far he would be prepared to back them, who knows that might have made stage 10. |
|
|
|
Post by Ironsides on Nov 24, 2017 0:47:25 GMT
The posts were intended to mislead both the forum readers and Hät, any genuine poster wouldnt need to hide behind a dozen user names with self supporting posts to get their point across.... There is no problem at all with any genuine and honest discussion...  |
|
|
|
Post by Graeme on Nov 24, 2017 2:13:37 GMT
Quite right he's trying to mislead HaT as to the level of interest in this set and advance his own preference above those who have made honest requests for other sets. And that's not acceptable. Brian is right about the crowd funding situation though, if every one of this guys multiple personalities pledged for 10 boxes and put the money up front there wouldn't be a problem.  For the record I believe I would buy Brunswickers. Brunswickers already exist in non-MAC format. The only point of more Brunswickers would be as a MAC release I believe the proposed set of Brunswickers was a marching set to satisfy the wargamers needs for a lot of marching figures. But HaT has said that they are making sets that already have masters made before moving on to other things and I'm not sure this set did advance to the masters stage. As I said I'll buy them if HaT makes them. |
|
|
|
Post by richard on Nov 24, 2017 14:08:47 GMT
Hi All, you should be aware that the guest posters asking for Brunwickers, was all the same person using different guest names, this user has been banned and all posts deleted. Sounds like I'll be cancelling my plans then to spend the next 72 hours creating pseudonyms and re-posting support comments for French and Indian war and AWI... |
|
|
|
Post by Edwardian on Nov 24, 2017 16:10:57 GMT
Well, I did wonder, all those guests with similar views!
Don't let this detract from the support for Brunswickers in the MAC format!
My take is this: MAC Austrians should probably claim priority. It's not a personal priority for me at the moment, but as Napoleon's most numerous and frequent opponent, and with new early French infantry due, it's an obvious choice.
But, I would back (and buy) MAC Brunswickers Leaving the Peninsular aside, at Waterloo there was a whole Division, with 7 Light or Line battalions with an average strength of 600 men each. Apply your chosen figure ratio and buy accordingly!
As someone using a 1:20 ratio, and hence aiming for around 200 figures, MAC sets would make a lot of sense!
|
|
|
|
Post by steve on Nov 24, 2017 21:10:56 GMT
I never realised there was a lot support for the Brunswick infantry but I would support it myself if I didn't want the Austrians so much, some Brunswick artillery would be nice as well & HaT don't seem happy making artillery sets, although the artillery sets I have had from them have been OK .
|
|
